The same DICOM AET on different and separate devices (having different IP addresses) - allowed?











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












Can I use the same DICOM AETs on two devices having different IP addresses (but still in the same IPv4 subnet)? So that they would work independently. Can I then configure them to communicate with each other or only with different DICOM network partners?



I am using cloned machines and it is easier to just change the IP addresses and hostnames than also the AETs.



I could only find information here (but I cannot say if it is official or find any reference to DICOM standard):
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.protocols.dicom/QwqJF3SheEg



A little different question was asked here:
using single AE title to more than one Ipaddress






dicom







share|improve this question







New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Why doesn't the linked question answer your own? According to this answer, only addresses of the same machine can share the same DICOM AE title.
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • "A single Application Entity Title can be associated with multiple network addresses assigned to a single system (e.g., multi-homed host)."
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago








  • 2




    Yes, that phrase. Why doesn't it answer your question?
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • For my understanding it doesn't explicitly forbid to assign it on different machine. Or am I wrong?
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago










  • It is not how DICOM wants to have the AETs. However, it should work as long as you do not use any network services in which the server needs to open an association with the client (e.g. Storage Commitment, Retrieve). However, finding issues caused by AET clashes can be really hard, so I think you would be better off to spend the time needed for the AET changes.
    – kritzel_sw
    17 hours ago

















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












Can I use the same DICOM AETs on two devices having different IP addresses (but still in the same IPv4 subnet)? So that they would work independently. Can I then configure them to communicate with each other or only with different DICOM network partners?



I am using cloned machines and it is easier to just change the IP addresses and hostnames than also the AETs.



I could only find information here (but I cannot say if it is official or find any reference to DICOM standard):
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.protocols.dicom/QwqJF3SheEg



A little different question was asked here:
using single AE title to more than one Ipaddress






dicom







share|improve this question







New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Why doesn't the linked question answer your own? According to this answer, only addresses of the same machine can share the same DICOM AE title.
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • "A single Application Entity Title can be associated with multiple network addresses assigned to a single system (e.g., multi-homed host)."
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago








  • 2




    Yes, that phrase. Why doesn't it answer your question?
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • For my understanding it doesn't explicitly forbid to assign it on different machine. Or am I wrong?
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago










  • It is not how DICOM wants to have the AETs. However, it should work as long as you do not use any network services in which the server needs to open an association with the client (e.g. Storage Commitment, Retrieve). However, finding issues caused by AET clashes can be really hard, so I think you would be better off to spend the time needed for the AET changes.
    – kritzel_sw
    17 hours ago















up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite











Can I use the same DICOM AETs on two devices having different IP addresses (but still in the same IPv4 subnet)? So that they would work independently. Can I then configure them to communicate with each other or only with different DICOM network partners?



I am using cloned machines and it is easier to just change the IP addresses and hostnames than also the AETs.



I could only find information here (but I cannot say if it is official or find any reference to DICOM standard):
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.protocols.dicom/QwqJF3SheEg



A little different question was asked here:
using single AE title to more than one Ipaddress






dicom







share|improve this question







New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Can I use the same DICOM AETs on two devices having different IP addresses (but still in the same IPv4 subnet)? So that they would work independently. Can I then configure them to communicate with each other or only with different DICOM network partners?



I am using cloned machines and it is easier to just change the IP addresses and hostnames than also the AETs.



I could only find information here (but I cannot say if it is official or find any reference to DICOM standard):
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.protocols.dicom/QwqJF3SheEg



A little different question was asked here:
using single AE title to more than one Ipaddress






dicom




dicom






share|improve this question







New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 18 hours ago









Rob Bar

1




1




New contributor




Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Rob Bar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Why doesn't the linked question answer your own? According to this answer, only addresses of the same machine can share the same DICOM AE title.
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • "A single Application Entity Title can be associated with multiple network addresses assigned to a single system (e.g., multi-homed host)."
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago








  • 2




    Yes, that phrase. Why doesn't it answer your question?
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • For my understanding it doesn't explicitly forbid to assign it on different machine. Or am I wrong?
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago










  • It is not how DICOM wants to have the AETs. However, it should work as long as you do not use any network services in which the server needs to open an association with the client (e.g. Storage Commitment, Retrieve). However, finding issues caused by AET clashes can be really hard, so I think you would be better off to spend the time needed for the AET changes.
    – kritzel_sw
    17 hours ago




















  • Why doesn't the linked question answer your own? According to this answer, only addresses of the same machine can share the same DICOM AE title.
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • "A single Application Entity Title can be associated with multiple network addresses assigned to a single system (e.g., multi-homed host)."
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago








  • 2




    Yes, that phrase. Why doesn't it answer your question?
    – E_net4 is kind and welcoming
    17 hours ago










  • For my understanding it doesn't explicitly forbid to assign it on different machine. Or am I wrong?
    – Rob Bar
    17 hours ago










  • It is not how DICOM wants to have the AETs. However, it should work as long as you do not use any network services in which the server needs to open an association with the client (e.g. Storage Commitment, Retrieve). However, finding issues caused by AET clashes can be really hard, so I think you would be better off to spend the time needed for the AET changes.
    – kritzel_sw
    17 hours ago


















Why doesn't the linked question answer your own? According to this answer, only addresses of the same machine can share the same DICOM AE title.
– E_net4 is kind and welcoming
17 hours ago




Why doesn't the linked question answer your own? According to this answer, only addresses of the same machine can share the same DICOM AE title.
– E_net4 is kind and welcoming
17 hours ago












"A single Application Entity Title can be associated with multiple network addresses assigned to a single system (e.g., multi-homed host)."
– Rob Bar
17 hours ago






"A single Application Entity Title can be associated with multiple network addresses assigned to a single system (e.g., multi-homed host)."
– Rob Bar
17 hours ago






2




2




Yes, that phrase. Why doesn't it answer your question?
– E_net4 is kind and welcoming
17 hours ago




Yes, that phrase. Why doesn't it answer your question?
– E_net4 is kind and welcoming
17 hours ago












For my understanding it doesn't explicitly forbid to assign it on different machine. Or am I wrong?
– Rob Bar
17 hours ago




For my understanding it doesn't explicitly forbid to assign it on different machine. Or am I wrong?
– Rob Bar
17 hours ago












It is not how DICOM wants to have the AETs. However, it should work as long as you do not use any network services in which the server needs to open an association with the client (e.g. Storage Commitment, Retrieve). However, finding issues caused by AET clashes can be really hard, so I think you would be better off to spend the time needed for the AET changes.
– kritzel_sw
17 hours ago






It is not how DICOM wants to have the AETs. However, it should work as long as you do not use any network services in which the server needs to open an association with the client (e.g. Storage Commitment, Retrieve). However, finding issues caused by AET clashes can be really hard, so I think you would be better off to spend the time needed for the AET changes.
– kritzel_sw
17 hours ago



















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Rob Bar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53370940%2fthe-same-dicom-aet-on-different-and-separate-devices-having-different-ip-addres%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Rob Bar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










 

draft saved


draft discarded


















Rob Bar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Rob Bar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Rob Bar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.















 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53370940%2fthe-same-dicom-aet-on-different-and-separate-devices-having-different-ip-addres%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

Volksrepublik China

Image
Dieser Artikel befasst sich mit der Volksrepublik China und ist nicht zu verwechseln mit der Republik China (Taiwan). Siehe auch China (Begriffsklärung). Dieser Artikel wurde aufgrund von inhaltlichen Mängeln auf der Qualitätssicherungsseite der Redaktion Ostasien eingetragen. Dies geschieht, um die Qualität der Artikel aus dem Themengebiet Ostasien auf ein akzeptables Niveau zu bringen. Dabei werden Artikel gelöscht, die nicht signifikant verbessert werden können. Bitte hilf mit, die inhaltlichen Mängel dieses Artikels zu beseitigen, und beteilige dich bitte an der Diskussion ! 中华人民共和国 Zhōnghuá Rénmín Gònghéguó Volksrepublik China Flagge Emblem Amtssprache Chinesisch (Hochchinesisch) und anerkannte Regionalsprachen 1 Hauptstadt Peking Staatsform Republik Regierungssystem Sozialistisches Einparteiensystem Staatsoberhaupt Staatspräsident Xi Jinping Regierungschef Ministerpräsident Li Keqiang Fläc...
Read more

How to test boost logger output in unit testing?

Image
up vote 1 down vote favorite My application uses BOOST_LOG_TRIVIAL to log messages. I thought it's good to check in test (gtest) that correct messages are written there in given scenarios. Is there a way to somehow access what was written there after code was called? Or does it first have to be mocked in some way? I have googled a lot for this and haven't found any instructions, so either I am asking wrong questions or no one thinks it should be done. c++ logging boost googletest boost-log share | improve this question edited yesterday ...
Read more

Write to the output between two pipeline

Image
up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm trying to write to the output (echo) within two pipe to have a trace of what I'm doing but I have an error. Get-ChildItem $path -Recurse | Where-Object { $_.Name -match '.+?.log.(d{4})-(d{2})-(d{2})$' -and $_.LastWriteTime -lt $deleteDate } | Write-Output "deleting file" -PassThru | Remove-Item but I have this error : Write-Output : The input object cannot be bound to any parameters for the command either because the command does not take pipeline input or the input and its properties do not match any of the parameters that take pipeline input. I also tested in the Foreach-Object function Get-ChildItem $path -Recurse | Where-Object { $_.Name -match '.+?.log.(d{4})-(d{2})-(d{2})$' -and $_.LastWriteTime -lt $deleteDate } | Foreach-Object...
Read more