Midterm question in calculus exam that can be tricky











up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6












The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.




Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$




First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$



Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get



$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$



which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
    – Kemono Chen
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    If we let the integrand of $A_n$ be $f_n$, then $f_{n+1}=1/(1+f_n)$. If $f_infty$ exists, then necessarily $$f_infty=1/(1+f_infty)implies f_infty^2+f_infty-1=0$$. Indeed, $f_inftyequiv frac{-1+sqrt 5}2$ is a constant function. The main problem is justifying the switching of order between integral and limit. Dominated convergence theorem surely will do the job.
    – Szeto
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
    – Tianlalu
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago















up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6












The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.




Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$




First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$



Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get



$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$



which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
    – Kemono Chen
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    If we let the integrand of $A_n$ be $f_n$, then $f_{n+1}=1/(1+f_n)$. If $f_infty$ exists, then necessarily $$f_infty=1/(1+f_infty)implies f_infty^2+f_infty-1=0$$. Indeed, $f_inftyequiv frac{-1+sqrt 5}2$ is a constant function. The main problem is justifying the switching of order between integral and limit. Dominated convergence theorem surely will do the job.
    – Szeto
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
    – Tianlalu
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago













up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6









up vote
9
down vote

favorite
6






6





The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.




Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$




First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$



Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get



$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$



which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?










share|cite|improve this question













The following question was asked in a calculus exam in UNI, a peruvian university. It is meant to be for freshman calculus students.




Find $lim_{n to infty} A_n $ if



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + sqrt{x} }, ; ; ; A_2 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}} }, ; ; ; A_3 =
intlimits_0^1 frac{dx}{1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}} },
...$$




First of all, I think this is a hard question for a midterm exam, but anyway, notice that we can calculate $A_1$ by making $t=sqrt{x}$



$$ A_1 = intlimits_0^1 frac{2 t dt }{1+t} = 2 intlimits_0^1 dt - 2 intlimits_0^1 frac{dt}{1+t}=2-2(ln2)=2-ln2^2 $$



Now, as for $A_2$ I would do $t = frac{1}{1+sqrt{x}}$ which gives $d t = frac{ dx}{2 sqrt{x} (1+sqrt{x})^2} = frac{t^2 dx}{2 (t-1)}$ thus upon sustituticion we get



$$ A_2 = - intlimits_1^{1/2} frac{2 (t-1) }{t^2(1+t) } dt $$



which can easily solved by partial fractions or so. But, apparently this is not the way this problem is meant to be solved as this exam contained 4 questions to be solved in an hour. What is the trick, if any, that can be used to solve this problem without doing the unellegant partial fractions?







calculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









Jimmy Sabater

1,789217




1,789217












  • Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
    – Kemono Chen
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    If we let the integrand of $A_n$ be $f_n$, then $f_{n+1}=1/(1+f_n)$. If $f_infty$ exists, then necessarily $$f_infty=1/(1+f_infty)implies f_infty^2+f_infty-1=0$$. Indeed, $f_inftyequiv frac{-1+sqrt 5}2$ is a constant function. The main problem is justifying the switching of order between integral and limit. Dominated convergence theorem surely will do the job.
    – Szeto
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
    – Tianlalu
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago


















  • Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
    – Kemono Chen
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    If we let the integrand of $A_n$ be $f_n$, then $f_{n+1}=1/(1+f_n)$. If $f_infty$ exists, then necessarily $$f_infty=1/(1+f_infty)implies f_infty^2+f_infty-1=0$$. Indeed, $f_inftyequiv frac{-1+sqrt 5}2$ is a constant function. The main problem is justifying the switching of order between integral and limit. Dominated convergence theorem surely will do the job.
    – Szeto
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    @Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
    – Tianlalu
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago
















Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
9 hours ago




Can you prove it is valid to change the position of $lim$ and $int$?
– Kemono Chen
9 hours ago




1




1




If we let the integrand of $A_n$ be $f_n$, then $f_{n+1}=1/(1+f_n)$. If $f_infty$ exists, then necessarily $$f_infty=1/(1+f_infty)implies f_infty^2+f_infty-1=0$$. Indeed, $f_inftyequiv frac{-1+sqrt 5}2$ is a constant function. The main problem is justifying the switching of order between integral and limit. Dominated convergence theorem surely will do the job.
– Szeto
9 hours ago




If we let the integrand of $A_n$ be $f_n$, then $f_{n+1}=1/(1+f_n)$. If $f_infty$ exists, then necessarily $$f_infty=1/(1+f_infty)implies f_infty^2+f_infty-1=0$$. Indeed, $f_inftyequiv frac{-1+sqrt 5}2$ is a constant function. The main problem is justifying the switching of order between integral and limit. Dominated convergence theorem surely will do the job.
– Szeto
9 hours ago




1




1




@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
8 hours ago




@Szeto: Could you post your comment as an answer (with details)? ( ̄▽ ̄)
– Tianlalu
8 hours ago




1




1




I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
8 hours ago




I think this is meant to be solved without that dominated convergence theorem as it is meant for first-year students.
– Jimmy Sabater
8 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
$$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$



$f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
$$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$



We have the recurrence relation
$$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
$$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
$$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
$$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$



Or
$$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
$$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$



which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
$$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
$$d_0=0, d_1=1$$



I think you can now proceed.



Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
$$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 5




    It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago


















up vote
12
down vote













If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
$$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.



Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
    – Szeto
    7 hours ago








  • 7




    @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
    – Dubu
    6 hours ago






  • 5




    @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
    – zahbaz
    6 hours ago










  • @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
    – alephzero
    2 hours ago


















up vote
1
down vote













Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that



$f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$



are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have



$frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$



$frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$



$frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$



and so on.



So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004575%2fmidterm-question-in-calculus-exam-that-can-be-tricky%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted










    By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
    $$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$



    $f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
    $$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$



    We have the recurrence relation
    $$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
    $$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
    $$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
    $$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$



    Or
    $$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
    $$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$



    which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
    $$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
    $$d_0=0, d_1=1$$



    I think you can now proceed.



    Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
    $$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 5




      It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
      – Jimmy Sabater
      8 hours ago















    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted










    By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
    $$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$



    $f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
    $$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$



    We have the recurrence relation
    $$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
    $$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
    $$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
    $$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$



    Or
    $$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
    $$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$



    which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
    $$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
    $$d_0=0, d_1=1$$



    I think you can now proceed.



    Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
    $$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 5




      It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
      – Jimmy Sabater
      8 hours ago













    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    10
    down vote



    accepted






    By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
    $$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$



    $f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
    $$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$



    We have the recurrence relation
    $$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
    $$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
    $$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
    $$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$



    Or
    $$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
    $$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$



    which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
    $$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
    $$d_0=0, d_1=1$$



    I think you can now proceed.



    Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
    $$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    By the substitution $t=sqrt x$,
    $$A_n=int^1_0f_n(t^2)(2tdt)$$



    $f_n(t^2)$ is of the form
    $$f_n(t^2)=frac{a_n+b_nt}{c_n+d_nt}$$



    We have the recurrence relation
    $$a_{n+1}=c_n$$
    $$b_{n+1}=d_n$$
    $$c_{n+1}=a_n+c_n$$
    $$d_{n+1}=b_n+d_n$$



    Or
    $$c_{n+1}=c_n+c_{n-1}$$
    $$d_{n+1}=d_n+d_{n-1}$$



    which are the Fibonacci recurrence with initial conditions
    $$c_0=1, c_1=1$$
    $$d_0=0, d_1=1$$



    I think you can now proceed.



    Also, the general term of Fibonacci sequence $0,1,1,cdots$ is
    $$frac{phi^n-overlinephi^n}{sqrt5}$$ where $phi=frac{1+sqrt 5}2$.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 8 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    Szeto

    5,9142626




    5,9142626








    • 5




      It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
      – Jimmy Sabater
      8 hours ago














    • 5




      It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
      – Jimmy Sabater
      8 hours ago








    5




    5




    It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago




    It is very nice, but I believe this is a hard question to ask in a midterm for beginners. I dont think there is a more elementary solution, correct?
    – Jimmy Sabater
    8 hours ago










    up vote
    12
    down vote













    If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
    $$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
    Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.



    Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
      – Szeto
      7 hours ago








    • 7




      @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
      – Dubu
      6 hours ago






    • 5




      @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
      – zahbaz
      6 hours ago










    • @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
      – alephzero
      2 hours ago















    up vote
    12
    down vote













    If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
    $$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
    Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.



    Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.






    share|cite|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
      – Szeto
      7 hours ago








    • 7




      @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
      – Dubu
      6 hours ago






    • 5




      @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
      – zahbaz
      6 hours ago










    • @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
      – alephzero
      2 hours ago













    up vote
    12
    down vote










    up vote
    12
    down vote









    If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
    $$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
    Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.



    Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.






    share|cite|improve this answer












    If I were taking that exam, I'd speculate covergence and write the integrand for $A_infty$ as
    $$ S_infty(x) = frac{1}{ 1 + frac{1}{1+frac{1}{1+frac{1}{ddots} }}} = frac{1}{1+S_infty(x)}$$
    Solve the resulting quadratic for $S_infty^2(x) + S_infty(x) -1 = 0$ for $S_infty(x)=frac{-1+sqrt{5}}{2}$. Then we immediately have $A_infty = S_infty$.



    Then, I'd sit there and wonder what they intended for me to actually show on a freshman calculus exam.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered 7 hours ago









    zahbaz

    7,99121837




    7,99121837








    • 1




      Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
      – Szeto
      7 hours ago








    • 7




      @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
      – Dubu
      6 hours ago






    • 5




      @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
      – zahbaz
      6 hours ago










    • @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
      – alephzero
      2 hours ago














    • 1




      Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
      – Szeto
      7 hours ago








    • 7




      @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
      – Dubu
      6 hours ago






    • 5




      @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
      – zahbaz
      6 hours ago










    • @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
      – alephzero
      2 hours ago








    1




    1




    Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
    – Szeto
    7 hours ago






    Well, this is already mentioned in my comment on the OP. I don’t see the point to repost it as an answer. Moreover, this answer does not mention the switching of integral and limit, which is highly non-trivial. Poorly written.
    – Szeto
    7 hours ago






    7




    7




    @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
    – Dubu
    6 hours ago




    @Szeto Comments to the question should be left to improve the question, not to answer it. Comments may also be deleted if they do not serve this purpose. You should have incorporated your remarks into an/your answer.
    – Dubu
    6 hours ago




    5




    5




    @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
    – zahbaz
    6 hours ago




    @Szeto Are you suggesting that I copied your comment? Because I didn't pay attention to it. This answer is simply what would first cross my mind in a test-taking scenario. Your comment has strong points in it, and I encourage you to turn it into an answer.
    – zahbaz
    6 hours ago












    @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
    – alephzero
    2 hours ago




    @zahbaz The may also have "intended" you to show that the limit actually exists, which is easy enough to prove.
    – alephzero
    2 hours ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that



    $f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$



    are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have



    $frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$



    $frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$



    $frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$



    and so on.



    So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that



      $f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$



      are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have



      $frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$



      $frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$



      $frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$



      and so on.



      So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that



        $f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$



        are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have



        $frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$



        $frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$



        $frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$



        and so on.



        So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Let $A_n = intlimits_0^1 f_n(x) dx$. First show that each $f_n$ is a monotonically increasing or decreasing function in the range $[0,1]$, and hence $A_n$ lies between $f_n(0)$ and $f_n(1)$. Then note that



        $f_n(0) = 1, frac{1}{2}, frac{2}{3}, frac{3}{5}, dots$



        are the convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$, and $f_n(1) = f_{n+1}(0)$. So we have



        $frac{1}{2} le A_1 le 1$



        $frac{1}{2} le A_2 le frac{2}{3}$



        $frac{3}{5} le A_3 le frac{2}{3}$



        and so on.



        So the sequence $A_n$ is squeezed between consecutive convergents of the continued fraction expansion of $phi$. And so $lim_{n to infty} A_n = phi$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 4 hours ago









        gandalf61

        7,127523




        7,127523






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004575%2fmidterm-question-in-calculus-exam-that-can-be-tricky%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Volksrepublik China

            How to test boost logger output in unit testing?

            Write to the output between two pipeline